
IDEAL UK FIRE: Toward Informed Decisions on Ecologically Adaptive Land management for mitigating UK FIRE

ABOUT
Targeted management of the UK's fire prone landscapes will be crucial in enabling the country to achieve its commitments both to reach net zero by 2050 and to halt species decline by 2030. Many of our fire prone landscapes represent nationally significant carbon (C) stores and provide key habitats for unique species, but are threatened both by a changing UK wildfire regime and by policy changes and uncertainties around management tools aimed to mitigate this risk. Trade offs exist between the impact of episodic severe wildfire events and ongoing long term management practises, as well as between the positive and negative impacts of management tools on different prioritised ecosystem services; notably between habitat management and associated C storage and biodiversity provisioning. These trade-offs and the associated best management practices will vary between landscapes, thus selection of the appropriate land management needs to be very carefully considered at different locations. The evidence base to make this complex choice, however, is currently weak, undermining the ability of decision makers to assess the consequences of different wildfire management tools. IDEAL UK FIRE will address this urgent need, by determining the environmental costs and benefits of widely applied fuel management tools on habitat quality, biodiversity and the carbon balance in fire prone UK landscapes.
The project is formed around four areas led by different organisations and members of the project teams.

MISSION
Determine immediate short-term impacts of different vegetation management approaches (cutting, mowing, burning, non-intervention) on biomass, vegetation dynamics and carbon stores.
Determine the medium-term impacts on of different vegetation management approaches (cutting, mowing, burning, non non-intervention) on biomass, vegetation dynamics and carbon stores.
Assess the importance of landscape and management histories in impacting biodiversity (flora, insects and birds).
For fire-based treatments (prescribed burns), determine the level of soil heating across both mineral and carbon based soils within burned perimeters.
Predict how varied patchworks generated by different vegetation management approaches may act to mitigate landscape-scale wildfire spread.
Assess the impact of the proportion of land managed and the spatial arrangement of managed patches on floral, insect and bird biodiversity.
Model the long-term UK wide carbon-climate feedbacks of utilising different wildfire management tools, both historical and future simulations for each applied vegetation/land management strategy and apply the framework to optimise national-scale land management strategies for C and biodiversity gains.
Develop accredited training that communicates the cost-benefits of different management tools and how these trade-offs vary between landscapes and spatiotemporal-scales.
PARTNERS


























Forestry Commission UK, Natural England, The University of Manchester, Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Moorland Association, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, The National Trust, Clinton Devon Estates, Mill Farm House, Middlesmoor Grouse Shoot, Mossdale Estate Partnership, Winn-Darley ltd., Met Office, Forestry England, Defra